Advertisements   Division Home   Bid Results   Bid Tabs   Ad Report   VDOT Forms
Project Info
Order Number UPC State Project Number Last Date to Post Questions
M31 111713 0000-020-820, C501, B604 7/18/2025
Search Questions
Search
Question Type  
    The last date to post questions has passed. Any questions posed 72 hours before the letting date may not be answered. Export Q&A    
Question List
Subject: Sign Post Wood 4"x4" Type: Bid Sheet
Question Date: 7/18/2025 12:37:18 PM
This bid item is listed under the permanent installation specification, yet there are no permanent wood posts in the signage plans. Was this item meant to be bid under the MOT specifications?  
Answer   1 previous answer(s) Date: 7/18/2025 3:46:46 PM
Please bid in accordance with the current advertised documents.  
 
Subject: Unsuitable Materials Type: Plan
Question Date: 7/16/2025 3:30:40 PM
The note beneath the Grading Summary Table on plan sheet 2G states that unsuitable materials identified on the cross sections or encountered during construction shall be addressed and remediated as referenced and required in the Geotechnical report. However, the Grading Summary Table and bid items have been setup such that unsuitable materials will be removed and replaced with embankment material. VDOT specifications 106.04 (b) and 303.04(e) state unsuitable materials shall be removed from the project site and disposed of. Lastly, there are currently no bid items established for the treatment of unsuitable materials. Please confirm that contractors should bid the project to remove and dispose of the unsuitable materials and replace them with embankment material per VDOT specifications, the quantities as shown within the Grading Summary Table, and associated bid items and not bid the project to treat unsuitable materials as indicated by the note located under the grading summary table.  
Answer   Date: 7/18/2025 1:26:17 PM
For the purposes of bidding, offerors shall bid the project to remove and dispose of the un-suitable materials and replace them with embankment material per VDOT specifications, the quantities as shown within the Grading Summary Table, and associated bid items.  
 
Subject: Traffic Barrier Service Type: Specifications
Question Date: 7/15/2025 10:25:34 AM
Will MB-7D PC or MB-11A barriers be acceptable for the pay item Traffic Barrier Service  
Answer   Date: 7/17/2025 7:52:32 PM
Traffic barrier service shall be selected from the VDOT NCHRP 350 Approved List  
 
Subject: Paving Type: Plan
Question Date: 6/24/2025 3:19:50 PM
There is an item for Concrete Paved Entrance 7" shown on the table on sheet 2F(7) for plan sheet 4 of 27 SY. Could the owner specify where this work is located because we are unable to find it on plan sheet 4?  
Answer   Date: 6/24/2025 4:30:01 PM
This is Entrance #10, Bailey Bridge Rd East STA 23+40 RT.  
 
Subject: Bridge Girder Steel Diaphragn Type: Plan
Question Date: 6/23/2025 9:30:22 AM
Reference plan sheet 22 of 42 Cross Frame Section A-A. (Question from Fabricator) The design shows copes on the channel for the diaphragm's and then bending the channel web. We would typically weld a bent plate to the channel instead of bending the channel itself. Is this something that VDOT would entertain through an RFI if we were successful?  
Answer   Date: 6/26/2025 2:13:05 PM
Please bid accordingly. The contractor may submit an RFI during construction for the department to review.  
 
Subject: Drilled Shafts Type: Specifications
Question Date: 6/16/2025 3:49:49 PM
Please provide the Thermal Integrity Profiling special provision referenced on the bridge plans and Drilled Shaft special provisions  
Answer   Date: 6/24/2025 4:15:02 PM
The special provision will be included in next addendum.  
 
Question Date: 6/16/2025 3:50:44 PM
Will a demonstration shaft be required for the pier drilled shafts?  
Answer   Date: 6/24/2025 4:19:29 PM
No, a trial shaft is not required for this project.  
 
Subject: Architectural Treatment Type: Proposal
Question Date: 6/13/2025 2:27:44 PM
The previous special provision for the Architectural Treatment still remains in addendum #1. Can you confirm that we are to use the Architectural Treatment special provision dated June 2, 2025?  
Answer   Date: 6/24/2025 4:18:53 PM
Yes, the Architectural Treatment special provision dated June 2, 2025 is to be used.  
 
Subject: Blasting Type: Plan
Question Date: 6/13/2025 11:27:23 AM
Will blasting within 150-250' of the proposed 30" sanitary sewer be allowed for BMP E?  
Answer   Date: 6/24/2025 4:18:17 PM
In accordance with 5.3.5 of the Chesterfield County WSSP, blasting may occur if greater than 100’ from any utility line. A blasting permit must be obtained from Chesterfield Fire and EMS. If blasting is done near a utility, precautions shall be taken to minimize earth vibrations and air blast effects. Please reference the rest of 5.3.5 of the Chesterfield County WSSP for other requirements.  
 
Subject: AASHTOWare EBSX File Type: Bid Sheet
Question Date: 6/13/2025 11:24:41 AM
The EBSX File from Addendum No. 1 still shows 14% DBE Goal; please reconcile In addition; there seems to be an issue with the very last Bid Item 2080; it will not populate during and IMPORT. We have checked and it seems like everything is correct on our estimating side and also with the quantity and line/sequence number but it will not come over during an Import. Please check to see if there is anything on VDOT's end in AASHTOWare that is causing this. Thank you in Advance  
Answer   Date: 6/13/2025 1:29:46 PM
The EBSX File has bene rectified. DBE Goal = 11%. Thank you.  
 
Question Date: 6/13/2025 11:52:42 AM
Please disregard the portion of the question about the last Bid Item 2080; the issue was on our end. Sorry for any inconvenience  
Answer   Date: 6/13/2025 2:47:57 PM
Disregarded. Thank you.  
 
Subject: Piling Type: Plan
Question Date: 6/12/2025 2:18:59 PM
Please review and confirm pre-boring 30" quantities. Table and Proposal show 742' Total, with 371' at each abutment. Abutment A will have shorter piles than Abutment B based on abutment footer and pile tip elevations provided so abutment totals should be different.  
Answer   Date: 6/24/2025 4:17:40 PM
Quantity for SUBSTRUCTURE 30 INCH PILE PREBORING revised to 610 LF.  
 
Question Date: 6/12/2025 2:19:26 PM
Please review and confirm piling quantities. The total pile quantity should match the preboring 24in plus preboring 30in. Table/Proposal quantities have a total piling quantity of 804' and a total pre-boring quantity of 872'.  
Answer   Date: 6/24/2025 4:16:41 PM
Quantity for STEEL PILES 12” revised to 766 LF. Quantity for SUBSTRUCTURE 30 INCH PILE PREBORING revised to 610 LF  
 

Displaying questions 1 - 10 (of 47)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 First Previous Next Last