Advertisements
Division Home
Bid Results
Bid Tabs
Ad Report
VDOT Forms
ProjectWise
Login Or Create Account
Project Info
Order Number
UPC
State Project Number
Last Date to Post Questions
H23
120508
U000-235-110, C501
8/19/2022
Search Questions
Search
Question Type
All
Plan
Proposal
Bid Sheet
Permits
Specifications
Other
Export Q&A
Question List
Subject:
Utility Relocation
Type:
Proposal
Question
Date:
6/23/2022 10:56:55 AM
Identical to the previous questions asked regarding Verizon Conflicts the same requirement appears on page 200 paragraph 4 regarding SIG Facilities. Please clarify the intent ? These are potential unacceptable risks for a contractor on a Bid-build project, the preference would be to remove these requirements from the SP Book. It is notable that this same requirement is not included for Columbia Gas.
Answer
Date:
Subject:
Utility Relocations
Type:
Proposal
Question
Date:
6/23/2022 10:48:30 AM
Page 198 of the SP Book 4th paragraph in Section 105.08 states" If a Verizon facility is found to be in conflict with the proposed work... the Contractor is required to coordinate with Verizon directly and have the facility adjusted or protected at no additional cost to the project. This issue could arise in numerous locations and could cause significant delays and add significant costs to the project. This appears to be more of a "Design-Build" requirement that has been added in a Bid-Build Project. If in the course of the extensive design already completed if these conflicts are encountered how can the contractor be held responsible for the cost and/or schedule impacts ? Please clarify the intent of this requirement ?
Answer
Date:
Displaying questions 1 - 2 (of 2)
Page:
1
First
Previous
Next
Last
Construction Advertisement Bulletin Board (CABB)
Update Profile
CABB v2.0
© 2008 Virginia Department of Transportation
6/28/2022 3:09:16 AM
2008