Q/A Display

Export Q&A

Question List
Subject:	Utility Relocation	Type:	Proposal
Question		Date:	6/23/2022 10:56:55 AM
Identical to the previous questions asked regarding Verizon Conflicts the same requirement appears on page 200 paragraph 4 regarding SIG Facilities. Please clarify the intent ? These are potential unacceptable risks for a contractor on a Bid-build project, the preference would be to remove these requirements from the SP Book. It is notable that this same requirement is not included for Columbia Gas.
Answer		Date:



Subject:	Utility Relocations	Type:	Proposal
Question		Date:	6/23/2022 10:48:30 AM
Page 198 of the SP Book 4th paragraph in Section 105.08 states" If a Verizon facility is found to be in conflict with the proposed work... the Contractor is required to coordinate with Verizon directly and have the facility adjusted or protected at no additional cost to the project. This issue could arise in numerous locations and could cause significant delays and add significant costs to the project. This appears to be more of a "Design-Build" requirement that has been added in a Bid-Build Project. If in the course of the extensive design already completed if these conflicts are encountered how can the contractor be held responsible for the cost and/or schedule impacts ? Please clarify the intent of this requirement ?
Answer		Date:

Displaying questions 1 - 2 (of 2)
Page: 1 First Previous Next Last

Construction Advertisement Bulletin Board (CABB)
		Update Profile
CABB v2.0	© 2008 Virginia Department of Transportation	6/28/2022 3:09:16 AM 2008