Advertisements   Division Home   Bid Results   Bid Tabs   Ad Report   VDOT Forms   Login Or Create Account    
Project Info
Order Number UPC State Project Number Last Date to Post Questions
D14 109520 0022-054-772, C501 9/18/2020
Search Questions
Search
Question Type  
    The last date to post questions has passed. Any questions posed 72 hours before the letting date may not be answered. Export Q&A    
Question List
Subject: Incoming Voltage to Grinder Pump & Station Type: Specifications
Question Date: 9/15/2020 9:35:59 AM
What is the incoming voltage to the Sanitary Sewer grinder pump and station? My supplier is quoting an additional transformer if the incoming voltage is 208.  
Answer   Date: 9/16/2020 3:13:04 PM
The incoming voltage is 240.  
 
Subject: Cut Section Soil Classifications Type: Specifications
Question Date: 9/9/2020 10:57:33 AM
Almost all of the soils in cut sections show borings that do not meet the stated qualifications for fill. As most soils are ML, CH, and CL and the LL & PL do not meet the respective 45% & 20 or less specification, will the contractor be responsible for any manipulation of cut in road way used for fill? Or will the contractor be paid Regular Excavation for Un-Satisfactory soils to be hauled off? Then borrow to Import material back to site? As of now, the borrow quantity reflects most cut is good for fill.  
Answer   Date: 9/10/2020 9:24:42 AM
The CBR and Atterberg Limits requirements given on the plan sheet note are specific to off-site borrow and not regular excavation within the project limits. The Contractor would be responsible for drying or manipulating the roadway cut soils to use for embankment construction and meet compaction requirements in accordance with the plan sheet notes and Soil Survey Report. The Specifications do include language of being able to determine soils as being unsuitable at the time of construction. Where needed, payment will be made for Regular Excavation and Borrow in accordance with the Specifications.  
 
Subject: Geotech Report Type: Other
Question Date: 9/1/2020 4:06:30 PM
Is a Geotechnical Report available for this project?  
Answer   Date: 9/4/2020 8:29:57 AM
The Soil Survey Report PDF is available in ProjectWise.  
 
Subject: Stone at 5-3 Outfall Type: Bid Sheet
Question Date: 8/28/2020 10:51:49 AM
What stone is at the outfall of 5-3 into SWM Pond 1 and where will it be paid? Please see sheet 5, 2J, and 7.  
Answer   Date: 9/2/2020 10:20:37 AM
The outfall stone is to be EC-1 Class 1, 2 tons. The plans will be revised to include this quantity and the bid amount will be increased to 59 tons.  
 
Subject: Embankment Foundation Detail Type: Plan
Question Date: 8/28/2020 10:48:31 AM
Sheet 2B References an “Embankment Foundation” Detail. This detail calls out backfill procedures for various stations along Rte. 22 & 767. Where no backfill notes are mentioned, for example at station 204+25-205+00, what is the expected construction procedure for the embankment foundation?  
Answer   Date: 9/4/2020 8:27:54 AM
As stated in the detail, the Contractor will typically backfill undercut material "with suitable Regular Excavation or Borrow" to the depths specified. The backfill notes provide additional requirements or allowable procedures for some station ranges. The Soil Survey Report PDF is available in ProjectWise for reference as well.  
 
Subject: Pay Item for Stone at 4C-1 Type: Bid Sheet
Question Date: 8/20/2020 4:13:31 PM
What stone is at the outfall of 4C-1 into SWM Pond 2 and where will it be paid? Please see sheet 4C-1, 2J, and 7.  
Answer   Date: 8/21/2020 10:54:37 AM
The outfall stone is to be EC-1 Class 1, 24 tons. The plans will be revised to include this quantity and the bid amount will be increased to 57 tons.  
 

Displaying questions 1 - 6 (of 6)
Page: 1 First Previous Next Last 

Construction Advertisement Bulletin Board (CABB)
Update Profile
CABB v2.0 © 2008 Virginia Department of Transportation 5/5/2024 1:45:06 AM 2008