Advertisements   Division Home   Bid Results   Bid Tabs   Ad Report   VDOT Forms   Login Or Create Account    
Project Info
Order Number UPC State Project Number Last Date to Post Questions
506 110007 (NFO)PM5T-131-837, P401 1/20/2017
Search Questions
Search
Question Type  
    The last date to post questions has passed. Any questions posed 72 hours before the letting date may not be answered. Export Q&A    
Question List
Subject: Concrete Patching Type: Proposal
Question Date: 12/15/2016 11:17:46 AM
It appears the intent is to patch the underlying concrete within the areas that have been overlaid with THERMACO previously. Is it acceptable to place the concrete to the top of the existing THERMACO OVERLAY in these areas?  
Answer   Date: 12/16/2016 7:25:38 AM
Yes  
 
Subject: Guardrail Needs Type: Plan
Question Date: 12/14/2016 2:40:17 PM
How does the state plan to raise the pavement elevation 3.5" without raising the adjacent guardrail and maintain a safe roadway?  
Answer   Date: 1/17/2017 5:28:21 PM
VDOT will develop a separate stand-alone contract to adjust the non-standard sections.  
 
Subject: PAVEMENT PLANNING Type: Specifications
Question Date: 12/14/2016 8:07:30 AM
Mainline milling will be required for the asphalt tie-ins at bridge abutments and underpasses. This milling will consist of .75” of THMACO and the underlying rigid concrete pavement. How will this activity be paid?  
Answer   Date: 12/14/2016 3:08:55 PM
The milling of the THMACO and the underlying rigid concrete pavement at bridge abutments will be paid under Item 16532, RIGID PAV.TIE IN PLANING 0" 2". At underpasses, the depth and type of removal are specified in the table on Page 220, and shall be paid accordingly.  
 
Subject: ITEM # 16405 SMA-19.0 (76-22) Type: Specifications
Question Date: 12/14/2016 8:05:19 AM
On page 221, 223,225 in the specifications, item # 16405 SMA-19.0 (76-22) is shown to be installed on gore areas and left shoulders (to be paved with mainline), however the mainline paving in these areas calls for a different mix (item # 16404 SMA-19.0(70-22). Is this correct?  
Answer   Date: 12/14/2016 3:09:39 PM
Item #16404, SMA-19.0(70-22) should be Item #16405, SMA-19.0(76-22). The item number and description have been changed. Also, Item #16401, SMA-9.5(76-22) has been changed to Item #16503, SMA 12.5(76 22) to match the surface mix on the rest of the roadway.  
 

Displaying questions 1 - 4 (of 4)
Page: 1 First Previous Next Last 

Construction Advertisement Bulletin Board (CABB)
Update Profile
CABB v2.0 © 2008 Virginia Department of Transportation 4/23/2024 11:44:23 AM 2008