Advertisements   Division Home   Bid Results   Bid Tabs   Ad Report   VDOT Forms   Login Or Create Account    
Project Info
Order Number UPC State Project Number Last Date to Post Questions
I44 93094 (NFO)0001-026-576,C501,B607 10/21/2016
Search Questions
Search
Question Type  
    The last date to post questions has passed. Any questions posed 72 hours before the letting date may not be answered. Export Q&A    
Question List
Subject: Concrete Type: Other
Question Date: 10/21/2016 11:27:57 AM
We have not been able to find a supplier for the lightweight concrete because of the location of this project. Please advise.  
Answer   Date: 10/21/2016 12:04:14 PM
VDOT has not heard this from other vendors so we must assume that sources are available.  
 
Question Date: 10/21/2016 3:45:12 PM
We also have not been able to find a supplier for the specified concrete. Please advise.  
Answer   Date: 10/24/2016 3:21:45 PM
Several others have apparently not had this problem.  
 
Subject: NTP and Completion Date Type: Proposal
Question Date: 9/28/2016 7:15:10 AM
Now that this project has been delayed 1 month, NTP will not be given until after the Asphalt plants have closed making the completion of the Stage 1 work before spring impossible. Can the Department give the NTP by December 1st now that it has been delayed or can the project time frame be moved to April 2017 - April 2018?  
Answer   Date: 10/21/2016 11:56:51 AM
Phase 1 temporary median crossover paving and switch southbound traffic onto the northbound lane needs to be done no sooner than March 15, 2017 but no later than March 22, 2017 unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. The fixed completion date has been revised to April 23, 2018. See addendum letter dated October 18, 2016 for more details.  
 
Subject: Type: Proposal
Question Date: 9/26/2016 3:24:04 PM
There is a bid item in the Proposal for SM-19E 76-22 and the plan sheet shows SM12.5E and SM 12.5D on sheet 2A in the details and on Sheet 2C the pavement summary only shows SM 12.5E as surface course. How do we bid this ?  
Answer   Date: 9/27/2016 2:33:44 PM
This needs to be corrected. The Department is therefore delaying the receipt of bids until October 26th, and will issue an addendum.  
 
Subject: Bid Item 0760 Embedded Galvanic Anodes Type: Plan
Question Date: 9/16/2016 10:58:22 AM
Can you please confirm that the anodes are 100 gram XP 2 type anodes.  
Answer   Date: 9/20/2016 7:52:44 AM
The XP 2 will need to meet or exceed the 2016 specifications, with respect to zinc composition and current density.  
 
Subject: GR-2A Nesting on Front Type: Plan
Question Date: 9/15/2016 5:12:42 PM
Note 6 on the plans require GR-2A to be nested panel on the front with 6'-3" post spacing. Is there a specific reason why the state is not allowing the second panel hung on the back-side?  
Answer   Date: 9/20/2016 7:53:16 AM
Having the additional rail on the back or the front is okay.  
 
Subject: Railroad Right of Way Type: Proposal
Question Date: 9/6/2016 9:08:32 AM
Given there is no live tracks under the bridge; will CSX be requiring any review of demo, lifting, shoring or jacking plans? Will they require 150% of chart capacity on cranes used on their right of way? Will we be required to provide additional property damage and liability insurances? We recognize we are being required to maintain access to the existing path at all times under the bridge, will we be allowed to store material and equipment within CSX right-of-way under the bridge?  
Answer   Date: 9/6/2016 1:25:00 PM
1.) Yes, the ROW is owned by CSXT and they will review. ~~~ 2.) Yes, this is required when there is a potential to foul (defined as any activity where work is performed on CSXT ROW on page 115 of proposal). ~~~ 3.) Yes, this is required when there is a potential to foul (defined as any activity where work is performed on CSXT ROW on page 115 of proposal). ~~~ 4.) Page 124 of the proposal indicates the requirements to store material and equipment within CSXT ROW.  
 
Subject: Existing Plans Type: Specifications
Question Date: 8/24/2016 11:25:26 AM
Please provide the plans for the existing structure.  
Answer   Date: 8/26/2016 4:31:11 PM
These are post under Announcements on CABB.  
 
Question Date: 9/23/2016 3:47:43 PM
What are the specs on the Light Weight Low Shrink Concrete? I do not see anything in the proposal.  
Answer   Date: 9/26/2016 2:38:47 PM
See 2016 Standard Specification Section 217.12 for Low Shrinkage Class A4 Modified Concrete. Specification Section 404 that is listed in the Schedule of Items for the Light Weight Low Shrink Concrete does reference back to Section 217.  
 

Displaying questions 1 - 7 (of 7)
Page: 1 First Previous Next Last 

Construction Advertisement Bulletin Board (CABB)
Update Profile
CABB v2.0 © 2008 Virginia Department of Transportation 4/25/2024 11:04:20 PM 2008