|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
9/23/2016 12:17:10 PM
|
|
Please confirm there are no extended warranties, and the GC warranty is one year.
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
9/26/2016 10:31:15 AM
|
|
No warranties other than product warranties as shown in the spec.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
9/23/2016 12:16:31 PM
|
|
Please confirm there are no known hazardous materials on site, and that VDOT will claim generator status on transportation manifests if abatement is required.
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
10/7/2016 6:21:03 PM
|
|
Simple concrete patching and asphalt overlay of existing roadway surfaces, exclusive of structure decking, will not in and of itself generate hazardous waste or hazardous materials.
The contractor may generate other waste materials, possibly solid waste, wastewater from equipment cleaning, cleanup of spills and/or releases, etc.
As to the generator question, for all of our contracts, VDOT and our contractors must abide by applicable rules and regulations. If any waste is generated or a material spilled or otherwise released, both VDOT and its contractor are considered co-generators and by virtue of the VDOT contract, we rely on our contractor’s to perform all required activities pursuant to applicable rules and regulations for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
9/22/2016 11:32:09 AM
|
|
Please verify that patching and paving will stop at the gore area for any ramps that will be addressed in the contract.
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
9/23/2016 9:05:19 AM
|
|
The patching & paving will stop at the gore areas for all ramps addressed in the contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
9/20/2016 9:19:22 AM
|
|
Project revision dated Sept. 14, 2016 was downloaded from Falcon on 9.15.16. As of this morning, Falcon indicates last modification of RFP was on 9.16.16. It appears to be the same document we downloaded last week, the day before. Please advise what changed. Thank you!
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
9/21/2016 4:02:43 PM
|
|
There should be no changes between those two documents. If the revision letter shows a 9/14/16 date, you are looking at the correct proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
9/20/2016 7:51:52 AM
|
|
The two ramps on the southern portion of the Route 10 interchange appear to receive concrete patching with a THMACO overlay in the Typical. The existing ramps are asphalt. What is the Departments intent for the two ramps on the south side of the Route 10 interchange? Additionally, will the approach work be required on the southern bridge approach at Rte. 10 as indicated in the Typical?
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
9/20/2016 7:52:05 AM
|
|
The two ramps and bridge approach on the south side of the Route 10 interchange will not be addressed with this project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
8/23/2016 4:43:38 PM
|
|
The advertisement states the DBE requirement is 9%. The C-111 in the proposal states 3%. Which is correct?
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
8/23/2016 4:46:25 PM
|
|
The goal is supposed to be 9%. The specs say that the proposal governs over the advertisement. Therefore the Department must delay receipt of bids until September so that an addendum can be issued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
9/14/2016 4:35:29 PM
|
|
Will anything other than dbe goal, letting date and completion date be revised in the addendum?
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
9/16/2016 10:47:00 AM
|
|
The Changes to K62 are for the following;
Date Bids are Submitted
Completion Date
DBE Goal
Priority Designation Concrete Patching SPCN
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
8/31/2016 9:03:18 AM
|
|
When will the anticipated addendum be available?
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
8/19/2016 3:25:57 PM
|
|
Page 6 states that Priority I locations will be specifically identified in the bid documents. This information is not included in the bid documents. Please provide this information as stated in the bid documents.
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
8/23/2016 11:56:40 AM
|
|
General Note #20 identifies locations to be repaired. Additional Priority I locations are defined in the Bid Document as existing failures, potholes, and locations identified by the Engineer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
8/19/2016 3:23:34 PM
|
|
Page 6 of the proposal defines that there will be priority level I and priority level II for the concrete patching. There are no quantities provided for either of these items and the contract allows for a priority II to be moved to a priority I at the will of the Department. The successful bidder will be required to make repairs whenever and where ever the Department dictates. This is very subjective and proper pricing for this work is impossible. Would the Department please provide for a bid quantity for each of the priority levels so that a reflective bid price can be developed as well as a schedule for this project.
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
8/23/2016 2:49:14 PM
|
|
Patch locations and Priority (I or II) designations will be determined in the field by the Engineer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
8/19/2016 10:49:38 AM
|
|
The details provided on page 332 and 334 conflict in the work that is to be done. Which detail will be utilized?
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
8/23/2016 11:24:23 AM
|
|
The typical on page 332 is for the location from Route 10 to 0.11 MI N. Kingsland Rd OP. The typical on page 334 is for the location from Appomattox River to Route 10 for the approaches between the two Railroad bridges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
8/19/2016 10:53:31 AM
|
|
Please clarify what is to be done from the Appomattox River Bridge to Route 10 where there is an existing asphalt overlay.
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
8/23/2016 11:25:00 AM
|
|
The section from the Appomattox River Bridge to Route 10 will involve work at the bridge approaches only as indicated in the heading of the two typical sections for this location (pages 333 and 334).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question
|
|
Date:
|
8/19/2016 10:27:46 AM
|
|
Would the Department please explain the purpose for note 5 on pages 275 and 325. There is no work being performed on the shoulder so there is no need for this work.
|
|
Answer
|
Date:
|
8/23/2016 11:27:07 AM
|
|
The General Note is generic to all paving contracts and is only applicable if the situation is encountered.
|
|
|
|
|