Advertisements
Division Home
Bid Results
Bid Tabs
Ad Report
VDOT Forms
Login Or Create Account
Project Info
Order Number
UPC
State Project Number
Last Date to Post Questions
G47
105798
0001-076-171, C501
12/12/2014
Search Questions
Search
Question Type
All
Plan
Proposal
Bid Sheet
Permits
Specifications
Other
Question Type must be selected.
The last date to post questions has passed. Any questions posed 72 hours before the letting date may not be answered.
Export Q&A
Question List
Subject:
Status of amendment
Type:
Proposal
Question
Date:
11/24/2014 10:10:40 AM
In a previous question it was stated that the job is delayed in order for the Dept to obtain add'l Test Pit Data and provide that information with the cross sections. The bid date is approximately 3 weeks away, can VDOT provide an update on when this information will become available ?
Answer
Date:
Subject:
Bid date
Type:
Proposal
Question
Date:
10/10/2014 11:44:37 AM
There are rumors that the receipt of bids will be delayed. Is this true?
Answer
Date:
10/10/2014 11:54:27 AM
The bid letting date will be changed via addendum from Oct 22, 2014 to December 17, 2014. The delayed bid letting allows the Department to collect the additional utility test pit data to be plotted on the cross-sections.
Subject:
Comcast Handholes
Type:
Proposal
Question
Date:
9/19/2014 3:14:23 PM
The SP book regarding Comcast Handholes refers to details for Comcast within the plan sheets. The plan sheets do not show any specific details or designs for Comcast Handholes. Please clarify what we are to include for Comcast handholes
Answer
Date:
9/24/2014 11:42:51 AM
All Comcast facilities shall be 4’x6’x6’ concrete manholes as indicated on the plans. Any mention of Comcast handholes shall be disregarded. The detail for the Comcast Manhole shall be found on Sheet 52.
Subject:
Reg. Ex
Type:
Proposal
Question
Date:
9/18/2014 9:29:54 AM
Since this job doesn’t have “Regular Excavation”, how is the contractor paid for removal of sidewalks and curb and gutter?
Answer
Date:
9/18/2014 9:30:36 AM
The payment for minor concrete items will be paid under Lump Sum Grading.
Subject:
Stages & Limiitations of Work
Type:
Plan
Question
Date:
9/15/2014 1:51:12 PM
Plan Sheet 1K(1) states in note 10 that each phase and/or stage of work shall be completed up thru IM paving prior to starting the next phase/stage. Plan Sheet 1K(2) in the first note under Stage Construction appears to conflict with Note # 10 on 1K(1). Please clarify the intent of what work can be concurrent versus non-concurrent.
Answer
Date:
9/18/2014 9:37:31 AM
The first note on Sheet 1K(2) allows the contractor to work multiple locations with multiple crews if desired. However the intent of the note on Sheet 1K(1) is that once any open trenching starts across a roadway at a specific location, the contractor shall complete that work up thru the IM paving layer prior to opening the roadway to traffic or leaving that work zone to start on another section.
Subject:
Interim Milestones
Type:
Proposal
Question
Date:
9/15/2014 1:02:54 PM
THE SP Book states that the Milestone #1 Includes the work running along Rt 1 north of station 69+00... What if any portions of the work north of 69+00 but west of Rt 1 included on plan sheets 12-14, and 18-20 are included as part of the Interim Milestone ? More specifics are needed regarding the limits of the milestones. The same question would apply for MS#2 as there is significant work west of Rt 1 that is south of station 69+00, Is the work west of Rt 1 along Occoquan Rd (Rt 123) intended to be part of the Milestone ?
Answer
Date:
9/18/2014 9:36:42 AM
Milestone 1 to include all work items north of Station 69+00, left and right of Route 1 baseline. Work includes north-west quadrant of Occoquan Road and Route 1 intersection, midway on Sheet 11 and continues to include all the work on Sheet 12 through Sheet 20. Milestone 2 to include all work items south of Station 69+00, left and right of Route 1 baseline. Station 36+00, Right and Left of Route 1 Baseline through Station 69+00, to include Sheet 6 through midway on Sheet 11.
Subject:
Verizon & Cox Handholes - Grounding Requirements
Type:
Specifications
Question
Date:
9/12/2014 3:58:20 PM
Where are the specifications/details located for the grounding requirements for the Verizon and Cox Handholes?
Answer
Date:
9/18/2014 9:36:05 AM
There are no grounding requirements for the Verizon and Cox manholes and handholes.
Subject:
Verizon & Cox Handholes Lids
Type:
Specifications
Question
Date:
9/12/2014 3:57:28 PM
Do the Verizon and Cox Handholes need to have the bolt down lids or the key lock lids?
Answer
Date:
9/18/2014 9:35:28 AM
The handholes do not require bolt down lids nor key lock lids.
Displaying questions 1 - 8 (of 8)
Page:
1
First
Previous
Next
Last
Construction Advertisement Bulletin Board (CABB)
Update Profile
CABB v2.0
© 2008 Virginia Department of Transportation
4/26/2024 1:42:05 PM
2008